Iraq is EXACTLY like World War II (except for...)
Yesterday our leader
compared the fight against terrorism to World War II. Could our administration possibly come up with a more outrageous or fear-inducing and alarmist way to buoy support for its Iraq policy??? I think not.
Sure, the war on terror is a long-term, on-going battle for the safety of democracy which might be compared to WWII by a stretch. Sometimes its a real war -- Afghanistan -- and sometimes its a clandestine battle between our operatives and al Qaeda. Yet I fail to see how Iraq fits into this comparison.
Iraq did not invade and overrun all of its neighbors as Germany did in 1939 and 1940. Iraq did not have a military alliance or even friendly relations with the Taliban/al Qaeda when the modern day Pearl Harbor was carried out in New York and DC. And as far as our government can tell us now, Iraq did not possess any weapons of mass destruction which might threaten our soil.
Additionally, as far as our government can tell us now, Iraq did not harbor or export terrorists which might have threatened our soil. The foreign fighters which have given us so much trouble in the past year are not evidence of a pre-war al Qaeda-infested Iraq. These foreign fighters by and large came to Iraq for the purposes of testing themselves against and causing trouble for American invaders.
And what kind of message should Iraqis take from this World War II comparison? I doubt anyone could be too thrilled with a comparison that impliedly paints their country as a present-day version of Nazi Germany. Similarly, should we as Americans take this to mean that our troops will be occupying Iraq for years to come, much like Germany in the post WWII years??
As a recap: First we were invading Iraq because of weapons of mass destruction (which still was unjustifiable considering the lack of any actual threat and considering that WE are the only nation that ever used a weapon of mass destruction on another nation). Then when all that fell through, the Iraq war suddenly had something to do with freedom for Iraqis from a ruthless dictator. And now when that has failed to satisfy the American electorate, the Bush administration tries to swing the whole thing back to a protecting America theme.
I'm proud to say I never bought this administration's mountain of rubbish from day one.
PS - If we are supposed to take over and rebuild countries with ruthless dictators, shouldn't we be invading half of central Africa right now? Or at least talking about the sad state of affairs. There a lot of dead folks over there. Enough inexplicably dead folks to make Saddam look like a small-time street thug -- who happened to have a lot of oil.